NEWSLETTER
-LessMore Text+More
Print Share Article

February 28, 2013

Here We Go

Here we go. Here we go again aiding “rebels,” without knowing WHO they are.

Who exactly make up the so-called Syrian opposition (see below)? Jihactivists, i.e., a mixed bag of activists and jihadists (e.g., al Qaeda, Jabhat al-Nusra)? Or maybe the folks who declared they’d be willing to work with Hezbollah “because it did a glorious job when it stood against Israel"?

Are these the people the U.S. is preparing to give direct assistance to (as opposed to indirect assistance it has been giving)? Last time we looked, U.S.-supported rebels were (literally) singing the praises of Osama bin Laden (see "US $$ For Ode To Osama"). And weapons used by "rebels" in one region, were turning up in the hands of terrorists in other regions (see yesterday’s "Feeding The Enemy").

America has a history of arming the wrong side (e.g., Mujahideen/Taliban), yet it continues to do the same thing over and over, and expects different results. Isn't that the definition of something?

Telegraph.co.uk  |  February 27, 2013

US Set To Send Direct Aid To Syrian Rebels, Says John Kerry

America is preparing for the first time to give direct assistance to rebel forces fighting to overthrow the Syrian regime, following the lead of the UK and France in a shift in tactics aimed at attempting to speed the end of the country's bloody two-year civil war.

By Peter Foster, Jon Swaine in Washington and Ruth Sherlock

Syrian rebels.jpg
Rebels fire a mortar at Kwiriss airport in Al-Bab. Photo: AFP/GETTY

On Wednesday night reports claimed that the US proposals, which could be announced as early as Thursday, went as far as offering food and medical aid but stopped short of agreeing to provide items such as armoured vehicles, body armour and night vision goggles to Syria’s opposition council.

However John Kerry, the new US secretary of state, signalled that Washington would give its blessing should Britain and France choose to move ahead with such plans.

In December, the Foreign Office signalled that it would seek to amend an arms embargo on Syria to make it possible to send such equipment. Last night the Foreign Office said it would increase its support for the Syrian opposition, though it was not clear what form that support would take.

There was no indication that weapons would be supplied.

“We are examining and developing ways to accelerate the transition the Syrian people seek and deserve,” Mr Kerry said in Paris, after meeting Laurent Fabius, the French foreign minister.

Mr Kerry spoke as senior international diplomats prepared to meet in Rome today to discuss plans to break the deadlock in a conflict that is estimated to have killed about 70,000 people.

Rebel activists said the proposal fell far short of the kind of concerted intervention they say is needed to topple President Bashar al-Assad.

The Free Syrian Army said the Americans had been discussing increasing support for the rebels, spurred by fears that the Jihadist Jabhat al-Nusra group was gaining the upper hand in the revolution

“The Americans are now more open to the idea of arming the revolution,” said Louay al-Mokdad, a spokesman for the rebel army. “They know that if they do nothing it is Jabhat who will have more control. This new support means the FSA will be more organised and stronger; it will help us to control the ground.”

Rebels in the besieged city of Homs said the promises were “too little, too late”.

In Washington, activists who have lobbied for US support said the latest promises fell well short of the action needed to topple Assad and ensure moderate rebel groups won the day.

Ammar Abdulhamid, a Syrian dissident, said: “Bulletproof vests and night vision goggles will help you become a more effective fighter, but they will not protect you from MiGs, tanks and Scuds, or enable you to destroy them.”

Original article here.


Comments:

[Comment Rules]
We welcome your comments, but please comply with our Comment Rules. You must be registered and logged in to leave a comment. Comments will display your Username and location.

Log In »

Not a member? Register here!


Close
Posted by eblanch from Clarksburg, NJ on Mar 5, 2013
It is always nice to read about some poor possible jihadist essentially chastising the people of the United States because our government does not provide them with their wish-list of our taxpayer funded advanced weaponry. With monumental national fiscal deficits facing U.S. citizens, should Louay al-Mokdad and friends expect us to pay part of the tab for a civil war when the good, the bad and the ugly are anomalies?
Of course they do for it historically appears that the U.S. has been and will be the Salvation Army for Islamists and their allies world-wide.
Ironically, this feckless administration and its minions arm radicals and zealots while ardently trying to disarm its own citizens at home. One can only hope that al Qaeda and company will respect this administration and turn in their firearms/body armor/anti-tank weaponry when it’s all over. Not likely.