Archives
AND MORE...
The United Nuthouse
_____________________
Genocidal Murderers, Inc.
_____________________
Another Day At Cesspool Central
____________________
Bypassing Sanctions... Again
_____________________
July 12, 2012
Enough UN Treaties!
What’s with all the UN treaties the Obama administration is trying to shove down America’s throat, e.g., the Law of the Sea Treaty, aptly referred to as "LOST"; and the Arms Trade Treaty, in which Iran is playing a key role?! What exactly is America set to gain from these treaties?
Does anyone over at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue have a clue about this cesspool of an institution (aka the UN), which boasts an overwhelming majority of third world dictatorships and tyrannical regimes?
It's bad enough that a self-respecting democracy would choose to fund and participate in this global sham, but abrogating one's sovereignty to it on anything and for any reason, is downright criminal.
The American people voted for an American government, not some council or commission made up of tin-pot dictators, despots and genocidal murderers. And while we recognize the current U.S. administration is enamored of BIG government, a global nanny government would be too much for anyone (of sound mind) to bear.
Ronald Reagan once said:
"Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn’t pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same, or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children and our children’s children what it was once like in the United States where men were free."
If the American people don't wake up soon, we’ll be lucky to even get to those “sunset years”.
FoxNews.com | July 11, 2012
UN Arms Treaty Could Put U.S. Gun Owners In Foreign Sights, Say Critics
UNITED NATIONS – A treaty being hammered out this month at the United Nations -- with Iran playing a key role -- could expose the records of America's gun owners to foreign governments -- and, critics warn, eventually put the Second Amendment on global trial.
International talks in New York are going on throughout July on the final wording of the so-called Arms Trade Treaty, which supporters such as Amnesty International USA say would rein in unregulated weapons that kill an estimated 1,500 people daily around the world. But critics, including the National Rifle Association's Wayne LaPierre, warn the treaty would mark a major step toward the eventual erosion of the U.S. Constitution's Second Amendment gun-ownership rights.
Americans "just don't want the UN to be acting as a global nanny with a global permission slip stating whether they can own a gun or not," LaPierre said. "It cheapens our rights as American citizens, and weakens our sovereignty," he warned in an exclusive interview with FoxNews.com from the halls of the UN negotiating chambers.
The world body has already been criticized for appointing Iran to a key role in the talks, even as Tehran stands accused by the UN of arming Syrian President Bashar al-Assad's bloody crackdown on rebels. The Obama administration in 2009 reversed Bush administration policy by agreeing to take part in the talks. But in another exclusive interview with FoxNews.com, the top government official on the issue under President Bush says he's seen nothing new to convince him the U.S. should be at the table today.
While the treaty's details are still under discussion, the document could straitjacket U.S. foreign policy to the point where Washington could be restricted from helping arm friends such as Taiwan and Israel, said Greg Suchan, Deputy Assistant Secretary in the State Department's Bureau of Political-Military Affairs from 2000 to 2007.
Suchan also highlighted ongoing concern that the treaty may end up giving foreigners access to U.S. gun-ownership records.
On that score, LaPierre, who serves as NRA executive vice president, warns that the "UN's refusal" to remove civilian firearms and ammunition from the scope of the treaty amounts to a declaration that only governments should be gun owners.
But he revealed he was set Wednesday to tell the UN gathering that 58 U.S. senators had signed a letter saying that they would refuse to ratify any treaty that includes controls over civilian guns or ammunition.
Ratification by two-thirds of the Senate is necessary before an international treaty negotiated by the executive branch can become U.S. law. But the treaty could still go into effect elsewhere once 65 countries ratify it. Such a development could change the pattern of world arms transfers and reduce the U.S. share, which stands at about 40 percent of up to $60 billion in global deals.
The Bush administration opposed a 2006 UN General Assembly resolution launching the treaty process, but President Obama decided the U.S. would take part on condition the final agreement be reached by consensus -- thereby giving any of the 193 participating states an effective veto.
The safeguard is insufficient for opponents of the U.S. participation, not least because UN talks invariably involve compromise.
"The administration swears they have a whole bunch of red lines, and they will block consensus if anyone crosses them," said Suchan, now a government relations consultant as senior associate with the Commonwealth Consulting Corporation in Arlington, Va.
"But the dynamics of international negotiations are that once you get 90 percent of what you seek, you say, 'Maybe there is a way we can finesse the final 10 percent.'"
A clause permitting arms transfers solely between UN member states would allow UN member China to object to U.S. arms sales to Taiwan, a non-UN member that China considers to be a renegade province.
This would be highly problematic for the U.S. at a time when Beijing is engaged in an unprecedented arms buildup.
Another fear is that Arab or other states critical of Israel may use any treaty language on human rights standards to argue against U.S. arms transfers to the Israeli government – much in the same way they currently use the UN Human Rights Council to repeatedly condemn Israel.
Suchan said U.S. arms trade law is seen as... More here.
Log In »
And what is most disconcerting is the perpetual attack from foreign sources on the rights of citizens of the U.S. to bear arms. Here in the U.S. we like our guns and used to be proud when military men like Admiral Yamamoto were fearful of invading this land because behind every blade of grass was a gun.
This is further compounded by the apparent cooperation of Team Obama to see just how far they, and our enemies, can take the United States towards a defenseless, banana republic before Jane and Jack Public wise-up. Sadly, these same enemies are in the UN, which has become a dangerous conglomeration of crooks and tyrants who appear to be not so different ideologically than our very own Obama and Co.
Notable Quotables
"Mr. Netanyahu is one of the most media-savvy politicians on the planet. On Friday he appeared live via video link on 'Real Time with Bill Maher,' taking the host’s alternately sardonic and serious line of questioning with gazelle-like alacrity."
~ Anthony Grant, jourrnalist who has written for many major newspapers and worked in television at Paris and Tel Aviv, interviewing former PM Benjamin Netanyahu on Monday, at the outset of Mr. Netanyahu's new book (more here).
And Then Some
Dangling Israel
March 24, 2022
New Global Leaders
March 23, 2022
Ukraine Can Learn From Israel
January 31, 2022